Hold On To Your Guns 0 comments
published in
2009-09-30 10:48:00
quote
1 floor
The Supreme Court with that new "liberal wienie" Justice Sotomayer today has agreed to hear a case concerning an issue I suspect most of you didn't even think existed: Does the Second Amendment's ...
The Supreme Court with that new "liberal wienie" Justice Sotomayer today has agreed to hear a case concerning an issue I suspect most of you didn't even think existed: Does the Second Amendment's "Right to Bear Arms" apply to the states and local municipalities.
Stay with me here.
The Second Amendment says "A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed"
But the problem is that when the Bill of Rights was first enacted all the amendments applied to the federal government and not the States. No one disputes that and the First Amendment for example even starts out with "Congress shall make no law . . . . " Let that sink in. In the beginning the Constitution did not prevent a city state or county from preventing a citizen from speaking his mind preventing a defendant from having a jury trial or banning any newspaper. There might have been other laws enacted by the states that would provide that protection but the Constitution didn't help out.
But after states and local governments began trampling on its citizens the Supreme Court began considering whether the Bill of Rights could in some form or fashion be used to prevent states cities counties and any public subdivision from committing civil rights violations. Here is where your head will spin: So began a series of cases using the "Incorporation Doctrine" which decided on a right by right basis whether that right "applied to the States through the enactment of the 14th Amendment." If you want to research that go ahead. Basically it says that the 14th Amendment sucks out some if not all of the first ten amendments and makes them applicable to the states. Call it mental gymnastics or judicial activism or just plain craziness but you can't take a Con Law class without studying it.
But like I said the Court has previously made those decisions on a right by right basis (freedom of speech freedom of assembly right to counsel etc.) But as of 2009 I think there are currently only two rights in the Bill of Rights that the Supreme Court has not decided whether they "apply to the States." The first one is the right to a Grand Jury indictment (which doesn't matter to Texas because Texas law requires that anyway) and the other is the Right to Bear Arms in the Second Amendment.
Yep this Supreme Court is going to decide whether the Second Amendment prevents for example the State of Texas the City of Decatur or Wise County from enacting laws that would ban gun possession. (If the Second Amendment doesn't apply that doesn't mean all guns are automatically banned. It just means that states and local governments are free to enact any law they want concerning the right to own or possess a gun.)
Think it's impossible for the Supreme Court to rule that the Second Amendment doesn't apply to all aspects of government? Justice Sotomayor and a the Second Circuit Federal Appeals Court have already done just that.
Annie get your gun.
Say what I think
Newest published topics
| Introducing Carlisa our Online ... |
| Sunday Train: Rescuing the Inn ... |
| Kathleen Reardon: Is The Presi ... |
| Child’s Play |
| It Takes a Licensed Village… |
Newest replyed topics
| Locog expects to beat sponsors ... |
| Hold On To Your Guns |
| My Scrap Home: I'm a soccer Mo ... |
| Let us build Pakistan: Mental ... |
| Gymnastics_pileup |
Topic keywords
more
should(326) team(278) win(261) question(260) handball(249) quot(241) amp(230) start(217) racing(215) football(210) volleyball(208) camping(204) bike(202) game(197) race(192) pool(191) like(185) snowboard(185) think(183) climbing(164) play(155) ice(148) rugby(144) skating(142) yer(132) sports(130) running(129) day(129) world(129) golf(127)